The drawings appear to be for a Starbucks on the East Parks Highway in Wasilla. This is not in the MOA Building Safety Service or Land Use area. Please clarify. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. It appears that some of the drawings are still indicating East Parks Highway in Wasilla. Please clarify. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment resolved. The site location has been modified. WAB - 6/9/2015

Please clarify what the foundation is for the new drive thru sign is and provide design for it. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if a response has been provided for this item WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. The response indicates that the footing is existing. If this is the case please verify the area of the new sign is not more than 10% larger than the existing sign on this footing. If it is greater than 10% larger than the footing will need to be checked for current load requirements. Please also clarify how the new sign is attached to the existing footing. If attached with post installed anchors design of these anchors will need to be provided. WAB - 6/9/2015

For the new menu sign, please provide the before and after dimensions. Where the area of the new signs is more than 10% larger than the existing, the existing foundation must be checked to the current code requirements. Reference IEBC section 303.4.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if a response has been provided for this comment. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. It does not appear as if the newest submittal addresses the comment. The dimensions of the new sign appear to be shown, but not of the existing. Please verify that the area of the new sign is not more than 10% greater than the existing sign. It is also not clear if the new sign bolts to the foundation using the same anchors as the existing. Please clarify. If post installed anchors are required, design of those anchors would need to be provided. WAB - 6/9/2015

Plese clarify what the foundation is for the new ditigal order screen sign is and provide design for it. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. Please provide design to ASCE 7-05. Currently the design appears to be to the 2010 ASCE 7 which is not yet adopted by MOA, and the wind map for ASCE 7-10 have not been released. It also appears that Risk Category I has been used when the signs should be designed for the sign category as the building which is II in this case. This foundation must also be stamped by an engineer licensed in Alaska and must also include wind and snow loads on the canopy. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. Has this sign been removed from the scope. It does not appear to be in the most current submittal. Please clarify. WAB - 6/9/2015

For the attachment of the drive thru building sign, please provide neoprene gommets at the screws or provide a similar separation element or provide austenitic stainless steel or aluminum screws as required by the Aluminum Design Manual section 5.4.1. This applies to both drive thru building signs. For brick wall installation the HLC-HX anchors do not have a current approved report. Please revise to a different anchor.

Comment no longer applicable. Per memo from Ross, the fastener requirements of ADM are no applicable to signs. WAB - 12/9/2014

For the clearance bar, please provide before and after sections. Where the area of the new clearance bar structure is more than 10% larger than the existing, the existing foundation must be checked for current code requirements. Reference IEBC section 303.4.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if a response has been provided for this comment. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment resolved. New footing has been provided for the clearance bar. WAB - 6/9/2015

Please clarify what the foundation is for the new thank you and exit only signs are and provide design for them. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if a response has been provided for this comment. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment resolved. Please show that the new sign area is less than 10% larger than the existing, otherwise the foundation must be check for the loads on the new sign. Please clarify the anchoring of the new signs. If post installed anchors are required they must be designed and a detail provided. WAB - 6/9/2015

There is a foundation shown on drawing number 16738-1P-105 and shows a foundation for a drive thru on panel. What does this apply too? Please clarify. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if a response has been provided for this comment WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. It does not appear as if this comment is applicable anymore. The most current submittal appears to indicate the drive thru foundation as existing. Please verify that this comment is no longer applicable. WAB - 6/9/2015

There is a foundation shown on drawing number 16738-3P-105 that shows a foundation for a drive thru three panel. Is this for the drive thru five panel sign? Please clarify. Reference AAC section 23.10.104.8.1.

Comment remains. It does not appear as if this drawing applies as the menu is going on an existing foundation; however this is not completely clear. If the new menu sign is being attached with post installed anchors, this attachment must be provided and designed. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. The most current submittal indicates the foundation for this sign as existing. Please verify that the area increase is less than 10% or show that the existing foundation can support the loads generated by the new sign. Please clarify the anchorage of this sign to the foundation. If post installed anchors are used they must be designed and a detail provided. WAB - 6/9/2015

Near the end of the submittal there is a canopy foundation. Please clarify what this is for. Canopy work can not be done under a sign permit. This would need to be designed and stamped by an engineer licensed in Alaska.

Comment remains. See comment 4. WAB - 12/9/2014

Comment remains. It appears that this comment is no longer applicable. Please verify that there is no sign/canopy anymore as it does not appear as if one is shown in the newest submittal. WAB - 6/9/2015

It appears there is welding on this project. Welding requires special inspection. Please provide a letter from the Owner indicating who they will be hiring to provide the special inspections for this project. The special inspectors must be licensed by MOA in the types of inspections to be performed. Reference IBC section 1703.1

Comment not applicable. Ross Noffsinger has set precedence on this on a previous project. Since these are non structural components that are not listed as requiring special inspections in Chapter 17 of IBC, they do not require special inspections. WAB - 12/9/2014