Review Comments

Click Here To Go Back To Permit Information

Permit Number:	98 6185
Permit Type:	Commercial Building Permit - None BldgAlter
Address:	W 5000 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RD Anchorage
Location:
Work Description:	Work Descr: demo and remodel of existing space for pen-air/era relocation of contract "c"/ checked in by Ross/gjs--Demo for non-sturctural app c. kustin 02-2-99-cah, Remarks: permittype =ALT/BAGGAGE CLAIM, status= FINAL 10/22/99, planstatus=
Status:	Closed
Project Name:	BAGGAGE CLAIM PENN AIR/ERA
Review Type:	Structural
Result:	Approved
Result Date:	3/15/1999 8:39:38 AM

Comments:

	Code Section	Review Comment	Status

Advisory Information:
. . Please furnish the report (completed by Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers) as requested in the preview meeting. O.K. - REPORT FURNISHED . Please furnish the report (completed by Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers) as requested in the preview meeting. O.K. - REPORT FURNISHED . The calcs submitted assume a uniform distribution of load to relatively uniformly spaced shear walls and braced frames with 5% added accidental torsion. But there is nothing that addresses the building configuration between construction phases. The heavy concrete shear walls constructed in this phase are all east of the transverse centerline of the building and appear to make uniform distribution of load unlikely. Have you given consideration to the possible effect of seismic lateral loads at this point? Please comment O.K. THIS AND FOLLOWING ISSUES TO B EADDRESSED IN THE NEXT PHASE . The calcs submitted assume a uniform distribution of load to relatively uniformly spaced shear walls and braced frames with 5% added accidental torsion. But there is nothing that addresses the building configuration between construction phases. The heavy concrete shear walls constructed in this phase are all east of the transverse centerline of the building and appear to make uniform distribution of load unlikely. Have you given consideration to the possible effect of seismic lateral loads at this point? Please comment O.K. THIS AND FOLLOWING ISSUES TO B EADDRESSED IN THE NEXT PHASE . In analyzing the existing slab for the new openings, you consider stiffness ratios but it isn't clear to me that the requirements of ACI 13.6.1.6 and 13.4.1, particularly for deflection, are met. Please comment. O.K. In analyzing the existing slab for the new openings, you consider stiffness ratios but it isn't clear to me that the requirements of ACI 13.6.1.6 and 13.4.1, particularly for deflection, are met. Please comment. O.K. It appears that , although you included snow loads in determining uniform loads, they dropped out of the rest of the calculations. Please comment. O.K. It appears that , although you included snow loads in determining uniform loads, they dropped out of the rest of the calculations. Please comment. O.K. The 1997 UBC Section 1630 requires consideration of a redundancy factor for horizontal components of E. Please verify that the redundancy factor = 1.0. O.K. The 1997 UBC Section 1630 requires consideration of a redundancy factor for horizontal components of E. Please verify that the redundancy factor = 1.0. O.K